When does this service fit?
For owners of a site or application with difficult tasks, unclear next steps or mobile usability problems.
Development scope
- Inspect core tasks, navigation, content, forms and error states on the target pages.
- Review contrast, readability, keyboard use, Arabic direction, zoom and small screens.
- Prioritize issues by impact, then redesign or repair with before-and-after comparisons.
From requirements to implementation
- Audit the journeys: Document obstacles in important tasks with screenshots and reproducible scenarios.
- Design the improvement: Review navigation, reading and form alternatives, then implement the suitable option.
- Retest: Repeat the same tasks on the revised version and check for regressions.
What is delivered?
- A report linking each finding to a page, issue, solution and verification criterion.
- Improved interfaces, components and interaction states across the agreed pages.
- Responsive, journey and accessibility test results with the coverage limits explained.
What needs to be defined?
Pages, devices and target accessibility criteria are agreed before implementation. User research needs actual participants; automated scores alone do not establish everyone’s experience.
A service-specific acceptance example
Complete a key task with a keyboard and a 320-pixel viewport; record barriers before and after remediation.
Scope, cost & schedule
The discussion starts with users, workflows, data volume, integrations and the existing system. Priorities are agreed, followed by a written first-release scope, cost, schedule and acceptance criteria. Later phases can follow business needs.
Testing, handover & support
The agreement defines handover files, usage rights, hosting, backups, updates and support. Agreed scenarios are tested, and operating setup, permissions and rollback procedures are documented before launch.
Explore related evidence
The acceptance criterion above is a planning example; actual tests follow your project scope.
Tafaqad Beta — Technology Planning and Project Coordination Related decision guideQuestions about this solution
Does the entire site need a new design?
The findings determine that. Branding or selected pages can be preserved while improving the pages and components that obstruct use.
Does the review cover both languages?
It can cover Arabic and English, testing each language journey for layout order, translation clarity and text length.
How do we know the change is better?
Criteria are set before implementation, such as completing a task without obstruction, clear errors and keyboard operation. User evidence is added when available.